Data Revealed — Time To Geek It Up

Data Revealed — Time To Geek It Up

It’s finally time to take a look inside.

First I have to apologize for taking almost 2 months to report on results that were secured after just 4 weeks of data collection.  That’s part of the problem with Evidence Based Cycling; once you do herd all those cats on bikes (see last post) and send them on their way to collect data, you have to eventually herd them over again to retrieve the data.  I only got the final piece of performance data last week.

I won’t hold you in suspense any longer, the results appear below in summary form — with the bottom line of: “What effect if any did this protocol or riding drill have?“ or perhaps more simply stated “Did we get an better?” or  better yet, would it be more appropriately states as “can this protocol be used as a specific prescription for improving Muscular Endurance in cyclists?”  Frankly, I want to know that for myself and my own riding, as much as I want to or need to know it for the riders I coach personally.

Summary Results

The summary results shown here simply compared the Baseline Test (our method for determining their power generation and sustainability levels at the start of the test) to their Performance Test that sought to measure the same thing, on the same bike, in the same manner.  The results seem to suggest that this riding drill for improving Muscular Endurance works.

 

SUMMARY RESULTS

Muscular Improvement

Endurance Improvement

Efficiency Improvement

Average Change:

5.03%

3.35%

17.29%

Throwing out High & Low:

5.04%

5.04%

13.90%

The one fact that can, and often does bring seemingly good findings into question is the sample size.  While we started with 11, we ended up with only 8 riders who completed the study.  There are a variety of reasons for this, none of which had anything to do with the test itself.  In any event, to be considered valid by almost any rigorous standard, this type of study would have to be repeated with a bigger sample size.  May this preliminary “investigative type research” would inspire some budding graduate student in the physiological sciences to pursue a wider study.

Are The Results Statistically Significant?

In terms of whether we can consider these results meaningful or not, we must first introduce the term or phrase associated with this question; “statistical significance”.  In regards to research findings, it has a fairly specific definition.  Wikipedia explains it this way:  “Statistical significance” is a statistical assessment of whether observations reflect a pattern rather than just chance…”  It further defines the level or degree of significance this way: “The choice of significance level is somewhat arbitrary, but for many applications, a level of 5% is chosen by convention.[3][4]

As you can see from the summary results, by all accounts calculated, only the Average Change in Endurance would come into question.  This is quite understandable given the fact that these results were assessed only 4 weeks after the study began.  In training other athletes, and in training myself as a semi-retired racer, I can tell you that most real and lasting training effects take 6 weeks to be “established”; established as in the gains are likely to not be reversed any time soon, and that there was a real cause and effect relationship between the work and the result.

The Gory Detail

Below is the table with all the numbers that make up the summary findings above.  Data geeks control yourself — these numbers only represent 4 weeks of following the M.E. protocol, and we need much more data to begin to think of implications beyond the obvious conclusions drawn from what we see here.  That will be the focus on our next blog post — what all can we see and say about this data and its implications for both training and further research.

 

Click image to enlarge

 

 

Stigler S (2008). “Fisher and the 5% level”. Chance 21 (4): 12. doi:10.1007/s00144-008-0033-3.

Fisher RA (1925). Statistical Methods for Research Workers (first ed.). Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.

Originally posted 2012-10-24 11:49:24.

Data Revealed — Time To Geek It Up

Intervals

rest interval stop watch

By Team ICG® Master Trainer Jim Karanas

Interval: n., the amount of time between two specified instants or events.

You teach indoor cycling, so you know intervals. If you asked another instructor for the workout he/she used in class that morning, odds are you’d get a response something like, “The main climbing set was 4 X 5/1:30 min at 85%,” indicating four five-minute climbs at 85% max effort, with 90 seconds of recovery between efforts.

Intervals are standard practice in indoor cycling and all types of CV training because of how effective they are. Interval training dates back to the 1930s, when German coach Dr. Woldemar Gerschler pioneered training methods based on sound physiological principles. He teamed up with cardiologist Dr. Herbert Reindel to develop a training protocol that would maximize the heart’s fitness.

The study involved some 3000 subjects completing three weeks of precise, heart rate-controlled training. The participants were track athletes who ran a relatively short distance at a very fast pace. Average stroke volume increased 20%, with significant improvements in performance. Gerschler and Reindel dubbed the repetitions “interval training” and considered the recovery period between the runs the most important part of the training.

When I first read this, I was amazed. To the founders of interval training, “interval” meant the recovery interval. When managed correctly, that period of time had the greatest physiological impact. The descriptive “formula” I used above would have made no sense to them because the rest interval should be the primary concern and dictate the repetition of the work effort.

For Gerschler and Reindel, if my heart rate did not recover properly in 90 seconds, I wouldn’t be allowed to do the next interval. Improved fitness would have occurred when my heart rate actually achieved the desired recovery in 90 seconds.

If that heart rate reduction didn’t occur, the workout was too difficult. Unless it was adjusted, the heart would be overworked, leading to fatigue and exhaustion, rather than to the desired training effect. So, the reduction of the recovery interval is the most important aspect of the training, not the degree of effort or duration of the work interval.

Consider the state of training within indoor cycling today in light of that information. Rigid interval formats form the core of most classes, with limited (or no) attention paid to what the founders of interval training actually meant by interval training. And not just in indoor cycling. Consider the prevalence of high intensity interval training (HIIT), such as the Tabata Protocol, in the fitness industry in general. Tabata intervals are often max efforts with extremely short recovery — less than half the duration of the work interval. Consider Gerschler and Reindel rolling over in their graves.

Is respect for recovery even possible with current class schedules, equipment or perceptions? My guess is no, except in selected, controlled situations. Is it even desired by the average class member? Most of them would not feel they were getting a good enough workout because we gave them too much recovery.

As indoor cycling instructors, we’ve all heard, “It’s not how hard you work but how fast you recover.” Yet it’s difficult to implement, given what we have to work with, and that includes the mindset of our members.

Maybe the question becomes whether or not we should really be doing intervals at all. When an interval is considered as described in the first sentence — the amount of time between two specified instants — then it’s a valuable tool for us as instructors. It allows us to develop patterns and give participants an understanding of the training we have planned for them. It also enables us to implement music more effectively by selecting songs by length to fit the patterns that we create.

As soon as “interval” becomes “interval training”, however, I think it’s wise to take a step back and consider where this kind of training came from and what the founders of interval training discovered about the work/recovery relationship.

Make that the recovery/work relationship.

Originally posted 2013-04-08 07:42:14.

The Weekly Ride – 072219 Beast Workout

The Weekly Ride – 072219 Beast Workout

Welcome to the The Weekly Ride by Cycling Fusion

  • Full Ride PDF
  • Apple Music Playlist
  • Spotify Playlist
  • File to Download the Ride directly into My Fitness DJ (Yes, no Programming)
  • The Ride will be available for purchase in the iClass Builder Store (No Programming)
  • A Podcast of the ride being delivered by a master instructor.
(more…)
The Weekly Ride – 072219 Beast Workout

The Weekly Ride – 050619 Soul Builder

Welcome to the The Weekly Ride by Cycling Fusion

Welcome to our new era of The Weekly Ride, you get:
  • Full Ride PDF
  • Apple Music Playlist
  • Spotify Playlist
  • File to Download the Ride directly into My Fitness DJ (Yes, no Programming)
  • The Ride will be available for purchase in the iClass Builder Store (No Programming)
  • A Podcast of the ride being delivered by a master instructor.
(more…)
The Weekly Ride – 042919 Speed Work

The Weekly Ride – 042919 Speed Work

Welcome to the The Weekly Ride by Cycling Fusion

Welcome to our new era of The Weekly Ride, you get:
  • Full Ride PDF
  • Apple Music Playlist
  • Spotify Playlist
  • File to Download the Ride directly into My Fitness DJ (Yes, no Programming)
  • The Ride will be available for purchase in the iClass Builder Store (No Programming)
  • A Podcast of the ride being delivered by a master instructor.

(more…)

The Weekly Ride – 042919 Speed Work

The Weekly Ride – 042219 Motown Ride

Welcome to the The Weekly Ride by Cycling Fusion

Welcome to our new era of The Weekly Ride, you get:
  • Full Ride PDF
  • Apple Music Playlist
  • Spotify Playlist
  • File to Download the Ride directly into My Fitness DJ (Yes, no Programming)
  • The Ride will be available for purchase in the iClass Builder Store (No Programming)
  • A Podcast of the ride being delivered by a master instructor.

(more…)