A member called to my attention that per their Terms and Conditions, Spotify is only permitted for personal use.
Meaning that you agree not to use it in commercial applications.
"That's not good" I thought and I immediately went to read what he was referring to. Here's the T&C page that includes this from Spotify:
3. Grant of license
You are granted a limited, non-exclusive, revocable license to make personal non-commercial use of the Spotify Software Application (including a right to download said application) and the Spotify Service and to receive by stream (and, where you have purchased the Premium Service or the Mobile Service, by conditional download), and in the case of the purchase of A-La Carte Downloads or Download Bundles, to receive Permanent Downloads of the media content made available through the Spotify Service in your home country. You do not have a right to transfer or sublicense your rights under this Agreement.
Before I got too excited, I decided to check what other Terms and Conditions I have agreed to - who reads those things anyway? It turns out that every music service or music software I use is restricted to Personal Use Only. Let's go down the list:
- iTunes has a similar restriction - (i) You shall be authorized to use iTunes Products only for personal, noncommercial use.
- Windows Media Player from Microsoft - Unless otherwise specified, the Services are for your personal and non-commercial use.
- My copy of MixMeister Express (no link) says: You may only use the MixMeister Software for Your private, non-commercial use.
So am I screwed? Do I need to learn how to perform as a one-man-band?
No
Are you prevented from using Spotify, iTunes, Windows Media Player or MixMeister to produce and deliver music for your class tomorrow?
I'm not an Attorney, so that's going to be your choice. I certainly don't want to be advocating you do something that's potentially in conflict with something you have agreed not to do... but I personally don't see this as comparable with using music that's been illegally downloaded in some fashion. Actually just the opposite 🙂
You've heard me state on this recent Podcast about music licensing that; as a content creator, I'm very much against the distribution of copyrighted materials without due compensation given to the creators.
What do you think about this?
Originally posted 2011-08-22 05:57:40.
- Q Factor – What is it and should you care? - November 29, 2024
- ICI/PRO In Staffanstorp Sweden - November 17, 2024
- Shiny (sweaty) Happy People - November 14, 2024
!@#$% Rubbish… As long as we are NOT illegally acquiring the music we use I feel we’ve done our part.
The way it was once explained to me is that many clubs purchase licenses, which allows instructors to use their own music in classes.
In the small minded world of LA Fitness, where they want you to use their canned CDs I’m not even sure they’re paying for the license that allows the instructors to use their own music. So…if you see me being hauled out in handcuffs, you’ll have your answer.
Laws and copyright regulation are not up to date with the evolution of technology !
When you buy a CD or a MP3 track, you read “USE ONLY FOR PERSONNAL USED”, so use only for your self ! Althrough we buy music, nothing say that we can use it for what we do.
There is a lack or regulation and to make it harder this regulation is managing different way in different place of the world !!! In some country if you pay a kind of tax you can use all music, in other there is nothing and in some you just can not …
More than a lack of regulation hypocrisy is high too !
What about when you have music producer or artist that give it “out of copyright” … how do you want to find the right and the wrong ?! Sorry but I can not find anywhere what we can really do and what we can not do …